<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leopard will probably kill Retrospect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftcolumn.net/2007/10/20/leopard-will-probably-kill-retrospect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftcolumn.net/2007/10/20/leopard-will-probably-kill-retrospect/</link>
	<description>Covering Mac OS X, Mac Software, and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.leftcolumn.net/2007/10/20/leopard-will-probably-kill-retrospect/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftcolumn.net/2007/10/20/leopard-will-probably-kill-retrospect/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Yes, and the retrospect site at emcinsignia.com is just as anti-intuitive, so finding support information or even version updates is time-consuming. But Retrospect was up until very recently the best option for Mac backup as far as I can tell, especially on a Network. If Apple could ship an enhanced version of Time Machine that would handle multiple external Time Machine backups (so you could take one offsite at a time) then I&#039;d go for that. 

I&#039;m now thinking I&#039;ll use Time Machine for local backups, Flash Drive for dailies, and another external drive for weekly snapshots to go offsite...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and the retrospect site at emcinsignia.com is just as anti-intuitive, so finding support information or even version updates is time-consuming. But Retrospect was up until very recently the best option for Mac backup as far as I can tell, especially on a Network. If Apple could ship an enhanced version of Time Machine that would handle multiple external Time Machine backups (so you could take one offsite at a time) then I&#8217;d go for that. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m now thinking I&#8217;ll use Time Machine for local backups, Flash Drive for dailies, and another external drive for weekly snapshots to go offsite&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftcolumn.net/2007/10/20/leopard-will-probably-kill-retrospect/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>leftX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftcolumn.net/2007/10/20/leopard-will-probably-kill-retrospect/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>It would be great if we could have a brand new Retrospect version:

- Truly Mac-like interface. The current interface is anti-intuitive and awkward.
- Native for Mactel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great if we could have a brand new Retrospect version:</p>
<p>- Truly Mac-like interface. The current interface is anti-intuitive and awkward.<br />
- Native for Mactel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

